Messenger comparison

Signal vs Telegram vs Markero: Privacy Compared

Updated October 27, 2026 · 8 min read · by the Markero team

In this article
The short answer Side-by-side comparison Signal: strong defaults, phone number required Telegram: convenient, but E2EE is optional Markero: zero-access by design What actually matters for privacy The verdict Frequently asked questions

The short answer

If you want a messenger where the company running the server cannot read your stored messages, then Signal and Markero both qualify, while Telegram mostly doesn't. The differences come down to a few specific things: whether a phone number is required, whether encryption is the default, and how much metadata is collected.

Here's the honest one-line version of each:

Side-by-side comparison

Markero Signal Telegram
End-to-end encrypted by default Yes Yes No (opt-in)
Zero-access (no readable messages at rest) Yes No No
Phone number required No Yes Yes
Email required No No Yes (or phone)
Two-factor auth (optional) Yes Optional Optional
Server holds only encrypted keys Yes No No
EU hosted (GDPR) Yes US Various
One-to-one video calls Yes Yes Yes
Group calls Yes (up to 6) Yes Yes
Free to use Yes Yes Yes

Signal: strong defaults, phone number required

Signal is widely considered the gold standard for encrypted messaging, and for good reason. It encrypts messages end-to-end by default, uses the respected Signal Protocol, and is run by a non-profit foundation. If you want a battle-tested private messenger, Signal is a legitimate choice.

The privacy caveats with Signal are real, though:

The bottom line: Signal is excellent for privacy among messengers that require a phone number. But it stops short of zero-access, and it anchors you to your real-world identity.

Telegram: convenient, but E2EE is optional

Telegram is one of the most popular messengers in the world, and its feature set — huge groups, channels, bots, cloud sync — is genuinely impressive. But its privacy model is frequently misunderstood.

If privacy is your top priority, Telegram's "encrypted" reputation is ahead of its technical reality. It's a great product — but its default mode is not end-to-end encrypted.

Markero: zero-access by design

Markero was built around a single principle: the server should never be able to read your messages, period. That's a stronger guarantee than "we promise not to look."

The trade-off is honest: Markero is a smaller, newer service than Signal or Telegram. It now includes one-to-one video calls and group calls for up to six people, at 480p on free accounts and 720p with Premium; calls are not available over Tor. It prioritizes one thing above all else — that your messages stay readable only by you and the people you send them to.

What actually matters for privacy

When you're choosing a private messenger, most marketing talk boils down to a handful of concrete questions. Ask these, and the picture gets clear fast:

  1. Is encryption the default, or something I have to switch on? If it's opt-in, most users (and most of their messages) are not protected.
  2. Does the provider hold the keys? If the company keeps a copy of your keys or can reset them, it can read your messages. Zero-access at rest means it cannot read stored messages.
  3. Is a phone number or email required? This ties your account to your identity and lets the service build a map of your contacts.
  4. What metadata does the provider keep? Even a great E2EE app can leak who you talk to, when, and how often — which is very sensitive.
  5. Where is the server, and under whose laws? Hosting jurisdiction determines what a company can be compelled to hand over.

Run Signal, Telegram and Markero through those five questions and the differences become concrete rather than marketing-speak.

The verdict

Choose Signal if you want a proven, battle-tested messenger and you're comfortable tying it to your phone number.

Choose Telegram if you need the biggest feature set, channels and bots, and you accept that most of your messages are readable by Telegram's servers.

Choose Markero if your priority is the strongest technical guarantee — zero-access encryption, no phone number, optional 2FA, EU hosted — and you don't mind a smaller, younger service.

There's no single "best" messenger for everyone. The right answer depends on your threat model: who you're protecting your messages from, and what you're willing to trade for convenience. The goal of this article is simply to help you make that choice with accurate information.

Frequently asked questions

Is Signal more private than Telegram?

For message content, yes — Signal encrypts chats end-to-end by default, while Telegram only does so in optional 'Secret Chats'. Telegram also requires a phone number and keeps more metadata.

Does Telegram really not have end-to-end encryption?

Telegram has end-to-end encryption, but only in 'Secret Chats' which you must enable manually and which don't support group chats or most devices. Regular chats are encrypted in transit and readable by Telegram's servers.

Which messenger does not require a phone number?

Both Signal and Telegram require a phone number to sign up. Markero is designed to require only a username — no email or phone number — so the account can't be tied to your real identity.

What is zero-access encryption?

Zero-access at rest means the service provider has no technical way to read stored messages. It stores ciphertext and encrypted key material, not usable decryption keys, so there is no readable message archive to hand over.

Try the zero-access messenger.

No email. No phone number. Messages only you and your recipient can read.

Create account